Janney/REITs: Weekly REITCap: Portfolio Managers Guide to Property REITs

FULL REPORT

REITS

Weekly REITCap: Portfolio Managers Guide to Property REITs – September 9, 2016
 

Our Weekly REITCap Portfolio Managers Guide provides general corporate information, total returns, valuation and balance sheet measures for 150+ property REITs across the major asset types (e.g. office, multifamily, retail, industrial), as well as more esoteric REITs (such as the prisons and towers).

 
  • For the week ending September 8, the MSCI US REIT Index (RMZ) return was +0.9% versus the S&P 500 return of +0.5%. The NASDAQ was +0.6%, the DJIA was +0.3%, the Russell 2000 was +1.5%, the DJ Utilities were +2.6%, and the S&P Financials were +0.2%.

  • The best-performing REIT subsectors last week were Data Centers and Towers (+2.3%), Triple-Net Lease (+2.2%), and Office-Suburban (+2.1%), while the worst were Hotels (-2.7%), Storage (-0.6%), and Apartments (-0.1%).

  • The best-performing REIT stocks last week were GEO (+10.6%), IRT (+6.8%), and MNR (+5.4%), while the worst were CMCT (-8.2%), AHT (-5.0%), and HST (-4.3%).

.
  • YTD REITs are now outperformingthe S&P 500 by 640bps. The REIT sector is now +14.8% in 2016, while the S&P 500 is +8.4%, both on a total return basis. YTD the Russell 2000 total return is +10.8%, the NASDAQ is +5.0%, the DJIA is +6.1%, the DJ Utilities are +18.0%, and the S&P Financials are +3.9%.

  • The best-performing REIT subsectors YTD are Triple-Net Lease (+34.0%), Industrial (+32.2%), and Healthcare (+25.4%), while the worst are Storage (-8.3%), Apartments (+0.2%), and Single-Family Rentals (+2.6%).

  • The best-performing REIT stocks YTD are SNH (+70.2%), GOV (+65.1%), and NXRT (+62.6%), while the worst are CXW (-37.4%), GEO (-19.8%), and NYRT (-14.3%).

.
  • Over the past 12 months, the REIT sector total return is +27.9%, while the S&P 500 is +13.2%. Over the last 3 months, the REIT sector total return is +6.5%, while the S&P 500 is +3.5%.

  • The US is outperformingmany of the major global real estate markets YTD. The YTD US REIT total return of +14.8% compares to +1.8% for Europe, +12.2% for Asia, -6.8% for the UK, and +15.6% for Australia.

  • REIT sector’s average cash dividend yield is 3.7%. This compares to the average yields on the 10-year Treasury (1.6%) and Moody’s Baa Corporate Bond Index (4.2%).

.
  • We remain Neutral on the US Property REITs. With a 10% total return expectation for 2016, we remain Neutral on the US Property REITs, as solid internal growth and continued access to inexpensive and plentiful capital are somewhat offset by strong valuations, greater levels of new supply, and the threat of higher interest rates.

  • In terms of our subsector views, we are positive on the Multifamily, CBD Office, and Industrial subsectors; neutral on Data Centers, Regional Malls, Self-Storage, Shopping Centers, Student & Manufactured Housing, Tower, and Triple-Net; and negative on Diversified, Healthcare, Hotels, Suburban Office, and Single-Family REITs. Specific company ratings and operating details can be found inside.

.
  • No changes to our earnings and fair value estimates this week

  • Our favorite small-cap REITs are ADC, AHH, CIO and TIER. We also like MAA and NNN among the mid-cap names, and AIV, EQR, and O among the large-cap REITs.

  • We launched coverage this week of Spirit Realty (SRC) and Monogram Residential (MORE). See our company-specific reports for complete details.

JANNEY - Monogram Residential Trust Inc MORE - BUY Price - $10.59 | Fair Value Estimate - $11.50

FULL REPORT

We are initiating coverage of MORE with a Buy rating. Our $11.50 estimate of fair value implies ~9% upside for the stock, which we believe when combined with a 2.8% dividend yield, provides an attractive potential return in the current market environment.

  • Apartment REIT focused on Class A properties. Based in Plano, Texas, MORE owned a portfolio of 54 apartment properties (including 2 under construction) across 10 Coastal and Sunbelt states totaling 15,211 units as of June 30. Also, MORE’s portfolio was 94.6% leased with a weighted average monthly rent of $1,909.

  • Reasons to own MORE: One of the newest portfolios, discounted valuation, and growth potential. We see upside to MORE’s stock price given (1) the benefits of one of the newest portfolios in the apartment space, (2) a discounted NAV valuation, and (3) ability to produce outsized growth both internally and externally over the next few years.

  • NAV valuations are attractive. MORE is trading at a 5.8% nominal implied capitalization rate (5.5% economic) or $204,000 per unit. This compares to the apartment REIT peer group at 5.3% (4.9%) and $334,000 per unit, respectively. Our $11.50 fair value estimate is based on our DCF valuation model.

  • Complexity issues, higher leverage, cost of capital, and less liquidity our biggest concerns. The MORE story is not without risks, most notably: (1) the majority of its assets are owned within JVs, which causes complexity issues and may have difficulty attracting the generalist investor; (2) despite recent improvements, MORE’s leverage levels are significantly higher than its peers; and (3) MORE has a higher cost of (and less access to) capital and less liquidity than its peers.

  • We remain Neutral on the US REITs, despite the group having already exceeded our 10% total return expectation for 2016. Heading into 2H16, we believe strong generalist investor interest, solid internal growth, and continued access to inexpensive and plentiful capital are somewhat offset by strong valuations, greater levels of new supply, and the threat of higher interest rates.

STIFEL: Office/Industrial REITs - Conference Call 9/7/16 - Value Creation or Destruction and Lease Economics Analysis. SLIDES ATTACHED. Dial-in Info Below.

FULL REPORT

 

Conference Call 9/7/16 - Value Creation or Destruction and Lease Economics Analysis. SLIDES ATTACHED. Dial-in Info Below.

  • We are hosting a conference call on Wednesday, September 7 at 11AM ET. Dial in numbers are as follows: (888) 267-2848 (Domestic); (973) 413-6103 (International); Conference ID: 987648;

 

  • A replay of this conference call will be available through September 21, 2016 - Replay dial in numbers are as follows: (800) 332-6854 (Domestic); (973) 528-0005 (International); Conference ID: 987648

 

  • We believe the best way to determine a company's ability to create (or destroy) value is to 1) review its Net Asset Value at a static cap rate, 2) adjust for dividends paid, 3) evaluate the lease economics and then 4) overlay projected property market conditions, portfolio expectations and development-driven value creation.

 

  • The body of this report reviews each company under our coverage and its Net Asset Value plus dividends paid during (in most cases) 2006-1H2016. In our summary of each company, we also provided a projection given the current strategy, development pipeline and lease economics.

 

  • Additionally, we have compared and contrasted the Lease Economics Analysis for the Office & Industrial REITs under coverage. We recently started this analysis to provide a forward look at expected portfolio performance based on the re-leasing spreads combined with the re-leasing costs. Evaluating one without the other is similar to a PB&J without either the PB or the J.


Pricing as of 9/6/16

 

  • Our primary conclusions: 1) creating value without the benefit of cap rate compression is not easy, 2) asset re-cycling and portfolio re-positioning appear to be working, 3) the dividend is vital over the long term, 4) quality development worked, while commodity development, plus high land inventories, proved disastrous, 5) the 2009 re-equifications were painful, 6) prudent, proactive equity raises were helpful, 7) quality assets and submarkets usually ruled the day, 8) high re-leasing costs and marginal re-leasing spreads result in value erosion

 

METHODOLOGY -- No Cap Rate Geniuses

 

  • Our methodology was to hold the cap rate fixed for the time period reviewed to determine share value creation or destruction absent cap rate fluctuations (no "cap rate geniuses" allowed), and add the dividend paid in order to determine portfolio value created or destroyed and total shareholder return.

 

  • For some companies with major portfolio re-positioning strategies, we adjusted the underlying cap rate.

 

  • This captures, from a valuation perspective, hard-to-detect nuances such as 1) excess capex and re-tenanting costs, 2) cash costs for balance sheet management, which were real costs in spite of being excluded from FFO, 3) real re-development returns, 4) the importance of the dividend in total return to shareholders, and 5) stock based compensation.

 

  • Note that we usually annualized our NAV estimates as quarterly estimates have often been volatile historically.

Weekly Holla! Prisons Break (Again) [Omotayo Okusanya, George Hoglund, Jonathan Petersen]

FULL REPORT

The RMZ was up (+1.5%) last week, outperforming the S&P 500 (+0.5%), as the 10 Year Treasury yield decreased 3 bps to 1.60%. Industrial (+2.7%) Office (+2.6%), and Infrastructure (+2.2%) outperformed. Prisons (-6.8%) underperformed on more negative sector news (see below). Lodging (-2.0%) and Retail - Malls (+1.1%) also underperformed.